Ekosistem Hizmetlerinin Sosyo-Kültürel Değerinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem ve Teknikler

Zahidenur Baycan

doi:10.53463/ecopers.20240314

Authors

Zahidenur Baycan Süleyman Demirel University, Institute of Applied and Natural Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, ISPARTA/Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-9955

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53463/ecopers.20240314

Keywords:

Cultural ecosystem services, social values, sustainability, human welfare

Abstract

This paper discusses the methods and techniques developed to determine the socio-cultural values of ecosystem services. The study focuses particularly on cultural ecosystem services (CEES), emphasizing their importance for human well-being and sustainability. In line with the aim of the article, the research examines the definition, classification and valuation of CES in a theoretical framework, and discusses methods such as surveys, semi-structured interviews, participatory mapping, economic valuation and social media analysis to identify their social values. The social values of KEH play a critical role in the sustainable management of natural resources and enhancing social welfare. As a result, it is recommended that the social values of KEH are protected and integrated into policy processes for sustainable ecosystem management. Examples illustrate how these methods can be used to identify the social benefits of these services and to engage local people in ecosystem management. Understanding the social value of KEH is critical for the sustainable management of natural resources and enhancing social well-being. This contributes to the conservation and management of ecosystem services in a way that is compatible with human well-being.

References

Albayrak, İ. (2012). Ekosistem Servislerine Dayalı Havza Yönetim Modelinin İstanbul Ömerli Havzası Örneğinde Uygulanabilirliği.

Arslan, E. S. (2022). Katılımcı Yaklaşım ve Halk Katılımlı Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 87-92. doi:10.51552/peyad.1218814

Arslan, E. S. ve Örücü, Ö. K. (2020). Kültürel ekosistem hizmetlerinin sosyal medya fotoğrafları kullanılarak modellenmesi: Eskişehir örneği. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 21(1), 94-105. doi:10.18182/tjf.651453

Arslan, E. S. ve Örücü, Ö. K. (2021). MaxEnt modelling of the potential distribution areas of cultural ecosystem services using social media data and GIS. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(2), 2655-2667. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00692-3

Berkes, F., Colding, J. ve Folke, C. (2000). Redıscovery Of Tradıtıonal Ecologıcal Knowledge As Adaptıve Management. 9 Haziran 2024 tarihinde https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2 adresinden erişildi.

Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T. ve Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8-18.

Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Body, J. W., Chan, K. M. A. ve Satterfield, T. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812-8819.

Fagerholm, N. ve Käyhkö, N. (2009). Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia—International Journal of Geography, 187(1), 43-60.

Fish, R., Church, A. ve Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21, 208-217. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002

Gould, R. K., Morse, J. W. ve Adams, A. B. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services and decision-making: How researchers describe the applications of their work. People and Nature, 1(4), 457-475. doi:10.1002/pan3.10044

Inglehart, R. ve Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51. doi:10.1177/000312240006500103

Krasny, M. E. ve Tidball, K. G. (2009). Applying a resilience systems framework to urban environmental education: Environmental Education Research: Vol 15, No 4. 10 Haziran 2024 tarihinde https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504620903003290 adresinden erişildi.

Lindhjem, H. ve Navrud, S. (2008). How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? Ecological Economics, 66(2-3), 425-435. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.005

MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-‐Being: Synthesis: Island Press. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 9 Haziran 2024 tarihinde https://chapter.ser.org/europe/files/2012/08/Harris.pdf adresinden erişildi.

Muhaci̇r, E. S. A. (2014). Ekosistem Servisleri Kapsamında Kırsal Turizm Alternatiflerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Ankara-Haymana İlçesi Örneği.

Mulci, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D. ve Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and society. 19 Kasım 2024 tarihinde https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269377?casa_token=_5g8mQlN1ZUAAAAA%3AxtOQunK92S4EqFhNE-r3DOUDfdd8Yhy1XXsPuzRJbnt0TpAbBtrt9GGzenCMXIZDD3h9p3xiLCyN6i0pX_wQQbmdgXtrOGEq3OpzbuQ6p0SY88612dwa adresinden erişildi.

Nahuelhual vd. (2013). Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile. Applied Geography, 40, 71-82. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004

Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M. ve Griffin, M. (2006). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise: International Journal of Environmental Health Research: Vol 15 , No 5—Get Access. 10 Haziran 2024 tarihinde https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09603120500155963?scroll=top&needAccess=true adresinden erişildi.

Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A. ve Kalivas, T. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1301-1315. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. 9 Haziran 2024 tarihinde https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320708002693 adresinden erişildi.

Retka vd.,. (2019). Assessing cultural ecosystem services of a large marine protected area through social media photographs. Ocean & Coastal Management, 176, 40-48. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.018

Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work.

Taş, M. (2021). Kültürel Ekosistem Hizmetlerinin Sosyal Medya Fotoğrafları Ve Maksimum Entropi Algoritması İle Modellenmesi: Aydın Örneği.

Taş, M. ve Arslan, E. S. (2022). Kültürel Ekosistem Hizmetlerinin Maksimum Entropi Algoritması Kullanılarak Modellenmesi. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 93-101. doi:10.51552/peyad.1222298

Turner, K. (2010). A pluralistic approach to ecosystem services evaluation (Working Paper No: 10-07). CSERGE Working Paper EDM. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/48825 adresinden erişildi.

Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J. ve James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3), 167-178. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001

van Jaarsveld, A. s, Biggs, R., Scholes, R. j, Bohensky, E., Reyers, B., Lynam, T., … Fabricius, C. (2005). Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: The Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1454), 425-441. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1594

Vasiljevic, N. ve Gavrilovic, S. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem Services. W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar ve T. Wall (Ed.), Life on Land içinde , Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (ss. 1-10). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_47-1

Wood, S. A., Guerry, A. D., Silver, J. M. ve Lacayo, M. (2013). Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 2976. doi:10.1038/srep02976

Yoshimura, N. ve Hiura, T. (2017). Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosystem services, 24, 68-78. 9 Haziran 2024 tarihinde https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041616301395 adresinden erişildi.