Reading Semiotic Orientation In Interior Architecture Project Process Through Student Projects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53463/8genart.202400276

Keywords:

Semiotics, interior design semiotics, semiotic analysis

Abstract

As an object of communication, space offers various identities to the user as a result of the subject-space interaction by transforming its physical elements into objects of communication. Interior semiotics, which focuses on the process of understanding and interpretation of this event, deals with the sensations created by the data of the space on the user and the processes through which these sensations pass. The formal abstraction methods that interior architecture education indirectly provides students with are a guide for them to create the meaning and identity behind their designs.

Within the scope of this study, firstly, a literature review was conducted in which general semiotic methods were defined, and two student projects were selected as a sample to be analyzed. It covers the analysis of syntagmatic and paradigmatic elements that exist on these projects within the framework of Ferdinand de Saussure's semiotic method. The outputs of the analyzed projects aim to reveal that interior architecture students are able to internalize and apply semiotic methods to design processes even without learning semiotic methods at the theoretical level. This study aims to emphasize the importance of integrating the concept of semiotics into the educational process in the discipline of interior architecture.

References

Akerson, F. (2019). Göstergebilime Giriş. İstanbul: Bilge Yayınları.

Atabek Ü. ve Atabek, G. Ş. (Ed.). (2007). Medya Metinlerini Çözümlemek İçerik, Göstergebilim ve Söylem Çözümleme Yöntemleri. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.

Eco, U. (2000). Açık Yapıt. (Çev. Nilüfer Uğur Dalay). İstanbul: Can Yayınları.

Gottdiener, M. (2005). Postmodern Göstergeler. (Çev. E. Cengiz-H. Gür-A. Nur). İstanbul: İmge Yayınları.

Grütter, J. K. (2020). Basics of Perception in Architecture. Bern: Springer Nature.

Guiraud, P. (1994). Göstergebilim. (Çev. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Yalçın). Ankara: İmge Yayınları.

Güneş, A. (2013). Göstergebilim tarihi. Humanities Sciences, 8(4), 332-348.

Hjelm, S. I. (2002). Semiotics in Product Design. CID-175.

Turan, A. Z. (2001). Tasarımda İletişim Sürecinin Oturma Elemanları Üzerinde İrdelenmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul). Erişim Adresi: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=5T1_CZ5-UGb9QCmoURec4OIchw3UGOuS7UHZ42uDFHBfTKs3K5iBJBMznTRMJE6I

Özçam, I. (2013). Biçim Dili ile İletişim Ekseninde Mobilyanın Sembolleşmesi ve Günümüz Mobilyasının Sembolleşmesinde Rol Oynayan Sosyolojik ve Teknolojik Etkenler. (Doktora tezi, MSGSÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.) Erişim Adresi: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=iTkOhwevEenJZ3onUvs52p2lHtiPzXtt4_cAllxlCgXF2Am8UJO2-r3D70-FasGL

Parsa, A. F. (2022). Fotoğraf ve Görsel Göstergebilim Üzerine [Çevrimiçi forum yorumu]. Erişim Adresi: https://kontrastdergi.com/alev-fatos-parsa-fotograf-ve-gorsel-gostergebilim-uzerine-50-sayi/

Peirce, C. S. (1978). Ecrits sur le signe. Paris: Seuil.

Rifat, M. (2018). Açıklamalı Göstergebilim Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.

Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce's Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

15-07-2024

How to Cite

Demirci, C., & Sarıman Özen, E. (2024). Reading Semiotic Orientation In Interior Architecture Project Process Through Student Projects. 8gen-ART, 4(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.53463/8genart.202400276